<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Costs Less? Recycline Razors vs. Gillette Venus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/</link>
	<description>Family Life On The Green Side</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:07:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Richard, you have a good point. The problem is that metal razors for women are harder to find. And maybe manufacturers want it that way. Perhaps a men&#039;s razor might work just as well. I haven&#039;t tried it. 

If someone likes disposable razors, Recycline can be a good choice though. One reason people get rid of razor handles is because they can get moldy when kept in the shower. What I don&#039;t understand is why they have so many deep ridges in them. A smooth razor handle would be much easier to keep clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, you have a good point. The problem is that metal razors for women are harder to find. And maybe manufacturers want it that way. Perhaps a men&#8217;s razor might work just as well. I haven&#8217;t tried it. </p>
<p>If someone likes disposable razors, Recycline can be a good choice though. One reason people get rid of razor handles is because they can get moldy when kept in the shower. What I don&#8217;t understand is why they have so many deep ridges in them. A smooth razor handle would be much easier to keep clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Although I like the idea of Recycline, why anyone would consider throwing away or recycling the HANDLE is beyond me. A good, METAL razor handle can last you a lifetime and the added weight of the handle makes for a better shave. I myself use a Schick razor from the 1960&#039;s--I put my used all-metal blades in a can, and the whole thing can be tossed in the recyling bin. And I have a metal-handled Twin Blade for the Recylcine cartridges that is already three years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I like the idea of Recycline, why anyone would consider throwing away or recycling the HANDLE is beyond me. A good, METAL razor handle can last you a lifetime and the added weight of the handle makes for a better shave. I myself use a Schick razor from the 1960&#8217;s&#8211;I put my used all-metal blades in a can, and the whole thing can be tossed in the recyling bin. And I have a metal-handled Twin Blade for the Recylcine cartridges that is already three years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jennifer. You can order 4 Preserve toothbrushes for 13.00 -- that&#039;s 3.25 each. That&#039;s what I did, along with my razors. I meant to use my own photo and forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jennifer. You can order 4 Preserve toothbrushes for 13.00 &#8212; that&#8217;s 3.25 each. That&#8217;s what I did, along with my razors. I meant to use my own photo and forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-2978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treehuggingfamily.com/which-costs-less-recycline-razors-vs-gillette-venus/#comment-2978</guid>
		<description>Good post. I like recycline so much - just wish their toothbrushes were cheaper. BUT Wild Oats throws them on sale and you can stock up. It&#039;s worth it for the recycling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I like recycline so much &#8211; just wish their toothbrushes were cheaper. BUT Wild Oats throws them on sale and you can stock up. It&#8217;s worth it for the recycling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
